Best
practice will always call for some form of project review. Many organisations
used to limit these to 'Post Implementation Reviews'. (Some
organisations still do). All too often these degenerated into witch
hunts, despite frequent claims to the contrary. There is nothing
wrong with the concept of a post implementation review. Ideally, it
should be the last of several reviews.
By
undertaking reviews during the life of the project, it is possible to
apply any learning towards improving the outcome of the project, rather
than 'learning valuable lessons from the failure of the project'.
We call these health checks, as they are geared towards detecting
problems, and taking corrective action in time to save the 'patient'.
The
number of health checks and the scope of them will depend on a number of
variables including the following project attributes:
- Size of the project
- Priority and criticality of the project
- Nature & function of the project,
- Duration of the project
- Project budget